OMFL vs. FLQL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while FLQL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OMFL returned 9.27%/yr vs 14.70%/yr for FLQL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OMFL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLQL.

Performance

OMFL vs. FLQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OMFL having a 12.39% return and FLQL slightly higher at 12.66%.

OMFL

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.53%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: —

FLQL

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 12.66%
• 6M: 12.54%
• 1Y: 29.48%
• 3Y*: 23.56%
• 5Y*: 14.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMFL vs. FLQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	12.39%	13.68%	6.82%	21.53%	-13.97%	28.95%	20.91%	35.58%	-2.55%	4.95%
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	12.66%	19.64%	24.33%	23.58%	-14.83%	26.58%	10.67%	29.09%	-2.79%	5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFL and FLQL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017	0.82

The correlation between OMFL and FLQL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

OMFL vs. FLQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OMFL	FLQL
Technology	31.0%	34.3%
Communication Services	11.7%	12.2%
Financial Services	11.5%	9.9%
Healthcare	10.4%	10.5%
Industrials	9.8%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.8%	4.4%
Energy	3.7%	1.0%
Basic Materials	2.5%	1.7%
Real Estate	0.8%	2.9%
Utilities	0.4%	1.6%

Return for Risk

OMFL vs. FLQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFL

OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 57
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 52
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FLQL

FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 71
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMFL vs. FLQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OMFL	FLQL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.31	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	3.24	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.42	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.27	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.12	15.42	-2.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OMFL vs. FLQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FLQL Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFL and FLQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OMFL	FLQL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.31	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.92	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.86	-0.16

Drawdowns

OMFL vs. FLQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, roughly equal to the maximum FLQL drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and FLQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMFL	FLQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.24%	-33.64%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	-9.05%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.52%	-19.32%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.44%	-21.41%	-1.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.08%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-4.04%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	1.92%	-0.24%

Volatility

OMFL vs. FLQL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is 2.40%, while Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that OMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMFL	FLQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	3.19%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.45%	10.21%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	12.85%	-0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.75%	16.12%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.11%	17.50%	+2.61%

OMFL vs. FLQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMFL vs. FLQL - Dividend Comparison

OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than FLQL's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	1.01%	1.10%	1.13%	1.50%	2.07%	1.81%	1.99%	1.78%	1.82%	1.22%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.75%	0.80%	1.22%	1.37%	1.55%	0.95%	1.48%	1.53%	1.39%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMFL and FLQL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, OMFL and FLQL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OMFL or FLQL?

FLQL has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to OMFL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs FLQL's -33.64%.

Which ETF is better, OMFL or FLQL?

On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.70% vs 9.27% for OMFL. On fees, FLQL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMFL or FLQL?

Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMFL or FLQL?

FLQL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OMFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMFL or FLQL?

FLQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.75% for OMFL.

What is the main difference between OMFL and FLQL?

OMFL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLQL is Large Cap Growth Equities. OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OMFL and 0.15% for FLQL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.