OILU vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OILU (MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - OILU is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Over the past 3 years, OILU returned 10.60%/yr vs 35.29%/yr for FNGS. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OILU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

OILU vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 96.53% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 16.26% return.

OILU

• 1D: 3.64%
• 1M: -10.84%
• YTD: 96.53%
• 6M: 77.49%
• 1Y: 115.83%
• 3Y*: 10.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 11.24%
• YTD: 16.26%
• 6M: 10.77%
• 1Y: 29.78%
• 3Y*: 35.29%
• 5Y*: 22.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILU vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN	96.53%	-16.50%	-21.65%	-32.50%	151.08%	-17.87%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	16.26%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	-5.10%

Correlation

The correlation between OILU and FNGS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021	0.12

The correlation between OILU and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OILU vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OILU	FNGS
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	28.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	10.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	59.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OILU vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILU

OILU Risk / Return Rank: 52
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 42
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 51

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 34
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILU vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OILU	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.46	+0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.03	+0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.26	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	1.30	+2.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.74	3.77	+4.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OILU vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OILU	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.46	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	1.06	-0.89

Drawdowns

OILU vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	OILU	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.00%	-48.98%	-32.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.51%	-22.93%	-10.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.09%	-26.77%	-42.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.14%	-1.61%	-45.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.59%	-10.87%	-39.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.32%	7.92%	+5.40%

Volatility

OILU vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) has a higher volatility of 25.14% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 5.64%. This indicates that OILU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OILU	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.14%	5.64%	+19.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.94%	15.68%	+34.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.23%	20.49%	+41.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.16%	29.96%	+51.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.16%	31.12%	+50.04%

OILU vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

OILU vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither OILU nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OILU and FNGS in my portfolio?

OILU and FNGS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OILU or FNGS?

OILU has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to FNGS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, OILU or FNGS?

On 3-year performance, FNGS leads with 35.29% vs 10.60% for OILU. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OILU or FNGS?

Over the 3-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 35.29% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OILU or FNGS?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OILU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OILU or FNGS?

OILU and FNGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between OILU and FNGS?

OILU is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILU and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OILU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.