PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILU vs. UCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILU vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 87.02% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 95.50% return.


OILU

1D
-4.14%
1M
32.93%
6M
40.98%
YTD
87.02%
1Y
99.31%
3Y*
0.08%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.22%

UCO

1D
-6.56%
1M
16.68%
6M
73.10%
YTD
95.50%
1Y
55.11%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
24.07%
ALL TIME*
-9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.15M$7.77M$7.91M
$130.59M$140.21M$148.94M

OILU vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OILU
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN
87.02%-16.50%-21.65%-32.50%151.08%-16.79%
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
95.50%-29.75%5.36%-13.89%39.71%-11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between OILU and UCO is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021

0.65

The correlation between OILU and UCO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILU vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OILU
OILU Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

UCO
UCO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OILU vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OILUUCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.44

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

3.68

+1.60

OILU vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OILU vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and UCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILUUCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.00%

-99.86%

+18.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.49%

-38.55%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.09%

-50.38%

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.70%

-84.83%

+35.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.69%

-82.13%

+31.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.87%

15.08%

+3.79%

Volatility

OILU vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) is 20.09%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 23.68%. This indicates that OILU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILUUCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.09%

23.68%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.12%

52.28%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.31%

60.10%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.79%

60.50%

+20.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.79%

317.77%

-236.98%

OILU vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OILU and UCO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

OILU vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither OILU nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OILU and UCO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCO has higher volatility (23.68%) compared to OILU (20.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs UCO's -99.86%.

On 3-year performance, UCO leads with 6.67% vs 0.08% for OILU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILU has been the lower-risk option at 20.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UCO has performed better with a 6.67% return vs 0.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILU and UCO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

OILU and UCO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

OILU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UCO is Oil & Gas. OILU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index, while UCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and ProShares.

OILU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILU and UCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer