PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILU vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 51.45% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 75.49% return.


OILU

1D
4.46%
1M
-26.24%
YTD
51.45%
6M
55.78%
1Y
39.41%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
10Y*

NRGU

1D
5.64%
1M
-22.47%
YTD
75.49%
6M
77.93%
1Y
61.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OILU and NRGU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.95

The correlation between OILU and NRGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILU
OILU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OILUNRGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.18

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

1.45

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

3.58

-0.94

OILU vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OILU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and NRGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILUNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.00%

-57.50%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.74%

-42.71%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.27%

-39.48%

-19.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.58%

-25.55%

-25.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.21%

17.39%

-2.18%

Volatility

OILU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) is 21.80%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 27.45%. This indicates that OILU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILUNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.80%

27.45%

-5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.07%

62.96%

-11.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.69%

76.67%

-12.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.13%

89.31%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.13%

89.31%

-8.18%

OILU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OILU and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

OILU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither OILU nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, OILU and NRGU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NRGU has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to OILU (21.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 61.72% vs 39.41% for OILU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILU has been the lower-risk option at 21.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 61.72% return vs 39.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILU and NRGU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

OILU and NRGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

OILU is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities.

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILU and NRGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer