OILU vs. WTIU
OILU (MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - OILU is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Over the past 3 years, OILU returned 10.60%/yr vs 5.93%/yr for WTIU. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
OILU vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 96.53% return, which is significantly higher than WTIU's 91.57% return.
OILU
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- -10.84%
- YTD
- 96.53%
- 6M
- 77.49%
- 1Y
- 115.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- -7.74%
- YTD
- 91.57%
- 6M
- 66.33%
- 1Y
- 103.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILU vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN | 96.53% | -16.50% | -21.65% | -29.40% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 91.57% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILU and WTIU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between OILU and WTIU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
OILU vs. WTIU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILU
WTIU
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
OILU
WTIU
Basic Materials
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Communication Services
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Defensive
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Financial Services
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Healthcare
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Industrials
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Real Estate
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Technology
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Utilities
OILU
-
WTIU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILU vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
OILU
WTIU
OILU vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 1.54 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.00 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.65 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 6.55 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.54 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | -0.09 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
OILU vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.00% | -75.73% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.51% | -39.11% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.09% | -75.73% | +6.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.14% | -32.10% | -15.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.59% | -39.19% | -11.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.32% | 15.83% | -2.51% |
Volatility
OILU vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) is 25.14%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 27.06%. This indicates that OILU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILU | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.14% | 27.06% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.94% | 54.98% | -5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.23% | 67.51% | -5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.16% | 70.62% | +10.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.16% | 70.62% | +10.54% |
OILU vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OILU and WTIU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
OILU vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither OILU nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, OILU and WTIU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
WTIU has higher volatility (27.06%) compared to OILU (25.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 3-year performance, OILU leads with 10.60% vs 5.93% for WTIU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILU has been the lower-risk option at 25.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OILU has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILU and WTIU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
OILU and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
OILU is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and REX.
OILU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILU and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer