OILU vs. WTIU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

OILU (MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - OILU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index while WTIU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILU returned 0.08%/yr vs -1.04%/yr for WTIU. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

OILU vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 87.02% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 95.37% return.

OILU

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: 32.93%
• 6M: 40.98%
• YTD: 87.02%
• 1Y: 99.31%
• 3Y*: 0.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.22%

WTIU

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 39.23%
• 6M: 55.77%
• YTD: 95.37%
• 1Y: 104.76%
• 3Y*: -1.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN	$8.15M	$7.77M	$7.91M
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	$1.41M	$930.94K	$851.49K

OILU vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN	87.02%	-16.50%	-21.65%	-34.22%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	95.37%	-17.13%	-29.63%	-28.45%

Correlation

The correlation between OILU and WTIU is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023	0.97

The correlation between OILU and WTIU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

OILU vs. WTIU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OILU	WTIU
Energy	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OILU vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OILU

OILU Risk / Return Rank: 56
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 46

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 55
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OILU vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OILU	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.51	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.99	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.19	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	4.99	+0.29

OILU vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and WTIU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OILU vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and WTIU.

Drawdown Indicators

	OILU	WTIU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.00%	-75.73%	-5.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.49%	-48.11%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.09%	-75.73%	+6.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.70%	-30.75%	-18.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.69%	-39.20%	-11.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.87%	21.07%	-2.20%

Volatility

OILU vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) is 20.09%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 22.17%. This indicates that OILU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OILU	WTIU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.09%	22.17%	-2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.12%	57.97%	-5.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.31%	69.79%	-5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.79%	70.86%	+9.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.79%	70.86%	+9.93%

OILU vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OILU and WTIU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

OILU vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither OILU nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OILU and WTIU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, OILU and WTIU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OILU or WTIU?

WTIU has higher volatility (22.17%) compared to OILU (20.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs WTIU's -75.73%.

Which ETF is better, OILU or WTIU?

On 3-year performance, OILU leads with 0.08% vs -1.04% for WTIU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILU has been the lower-risk option at 20.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OILU or WTIU?

Over the 3-year period, OILU has performed better with a 0.08% return vs -1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OILU or WTIU?

OILU and WTIU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OILU or WTIU?

OILU and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between OILU and WTIU?

OILU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index, while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and REX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OILU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.