OFRM vs. LINC
OFRM (Once Upon A Farm, PBC) and LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — OFRM in Packaged Foods, LINC in Education & Training Services. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OFRM vs. LINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OFRM
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINC
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 16.73%
- 6M
- 115.83%
- YTD
- 123.06%
- 1Y
- 137.84%
- 3Y*
- 107.15%
- 5Y*
- 49.97%
- 10Y*
- 42.05%
OFRM vs. LINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OFRM Once Upon A Farm, PBC | -12.19% |
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 111.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between OFRM and LINC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
OFRM:
$126.78M
LINC:
$1.71B
OFRM:
-$0.33
LINC:
$0.72
OFRM:
2.86
LINC:
3.10
OFRM:
4.89
LINC:
8.49
OFRM:
$262.80M
LINC:
$544.69M
OFRM:
$112.47M
LINC:
$242.75M
OFRM:
$7.56M
LINC:
$49.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OFRM vs. LINC — Risk / Return Rank
OFRM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LINC
OFRM vs. LINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Once Upon A Farm, PBC (OFRM) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OFRM | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OFRM vs. LINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OFRM drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, smaller than the maximum LINC drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OFRM and LINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OFRM | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.14% | -99.11% | +54.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.86% | -3.25% | -25.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.28% | -58.85% | +29.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.06% | — |
Volatility
OFRM vs. LINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OFRM | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.67% | 47.33% | +21.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.67% | 44.22% | +24.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.67% | 56.90% | +11.77% |
Dividends
OFRM vs. LINC - Dividend Comparison
Neither OFRM nor LINC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
OFRM vs. LINC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Once Upon A Farm, PBC and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OFRM vs. LINC - Profitability Comparison
OFRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Once Upon A Farm, PBC reported a gross profit of 29.68M and revenue of 72.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
LINC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
OFRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Once Upon A Farm, PBC reported an operating income of -16.15M and revenue of 72.72M, resulting in an operating margin of -22.2%.
LINC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
OFRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Once Upon A Farm, PBC reported a net income of -15.81M and revenue of 72.72M, resulting in a net margin of -21.7%.
LINC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OFRM and LINC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for OFRM and LINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer