ODDS vs. ICOW
ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ODDS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ODDS returned 7.66%/yr vs 20.17%/yr for ICOW. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
ODDS vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -16.40% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.
ODDS
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- -16.40%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- -13.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
ODDS vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | -16.40% | 16.71% | 27.61% | 25.03% | -14.96% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ODDS and ICOW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ODDS and ICOW has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ODDS vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ODDS
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ODDS
ICOW
Communication Services
ODDS
ICOW
Technology
ODDS
ICOW
Basic Materials
ODDS
-
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
ODDS
-
ICOW
Energy
ODDS
-
ICOW
Financial Services
ODDS
-
ICOW
-
Healthcare
ODDS
-
ICOW
Industrials
ODDS
-
ICOW
Real Estate
ODDS
-
ICOW
-
Utilities
ODDS
-
ICOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ODDS vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
ODDS
ICOW
ODDS vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ODDS | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.50 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 4.91 | -5.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 17.54 | -18.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ODDS | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 2.87 | -3.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.55 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
ODDS vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ODDS | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -43.49% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.09% | -8.02% | -27.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.09% | -14.81% | -20.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.27% | -0.64% | -29.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -7.59% | -1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.81% | 2.24% | +17.57% |
Volatility
ODDS vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 4.41%. This indicates that ODDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ODDS | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 4.41% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 10.59% | +5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.36% | 13.73% | +6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 16.64% | +8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 18.47% | +6.40% |
ODDS vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ODDS vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than ICOW's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.12% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | 2.91% | 2.59% | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ODDS and ICOW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ODDS has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 3-year performance, ICOW leads with 20.17% vs 7.66% for ODDS. On fees, ODDS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ODDS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
ODDS has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.
ODDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ODDS and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer