ODDS vs. BETZ
ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ODDS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ODDS returned 7.66%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for BETZ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.
Performance
ODDS vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -16.40% return, which is significantly lower than BETZ's -10.38% return.
ODDS
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- -16.40%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- -13.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETZ
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -10.38%
- 6M
- -8.91%
- 1Y
- -6.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
ODDS vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | -16.40% | 16.71% | 27.61% | 25.03% | -14.96% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -10.38% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -22.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ODDS and BETZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ODDS and BETZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
ODDS vs. BETZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ODDS
BETZ
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ODDS
BETZ
Communication Services
ODDS
BETZ
Technology
ODDS
BETZ
Basic Materials
ODDS
-
BETZ
-
Consumer Defensive
ODDS
-
BETZ
-
Energy
ODDS
-
BETZ
-
Financial Services
ODDS
-
BETZ
Healthcare
ODDS
-
BETZ
-
Industrials
ODDS
-
BETZ
-
Real Estate
ODDS
-
BETZ
-
Utilities
ODDS
-
BETZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ODDS vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank
ODDS
BETZ
ODDS vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ODDS | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | -0.30 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | -0.29 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.97 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | -0.21 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | -0.36 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ODDS | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -0.30 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.13 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
ODDS vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and BETZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ODDS | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -60.82% | +25.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.09% | -29.20% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.09% | -29.20% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.27% | -39.37% | +9.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -33.81% | +24.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.81% | 16.99% | +2.82% |
Volatility
ODDS vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) is 4.69%, while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that ODDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ODDS | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 5.29% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.74% | 15.81% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.36% | 20.49% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 26.94% | -2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 27.94% | -3.07% |
ODDS vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ODDS vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than BETZ's 5.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.10% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | 2.91% | 2.59% | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ODDS and BETZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BETZ has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to ODDS (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs BETZ's -60.82%.
On 3-year performance, ODDS leads with 7.66% vs 4.93% for BETZ. On fees, ODDS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, ODDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ODDS has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ODDS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.10%, compared with 2.91% for ODDS.
ODDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while BETZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ODDS and BETZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer