ICOW vs. FYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD).
ICOW and FYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2017. FYLD is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Dec 3, 2013.
Performance
ICOW vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICOW vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.88% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.98% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 14.87% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 13.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 14.87% return.
ICOW
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 6M
- 18.26%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 20.45%
- 1Y
- 43.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICOW vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICOW vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
ICOW
FYLD
ICOW vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICOW | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | 2.68 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 3.35 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.59 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.33 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | 19.43 | -3.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICOW | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.68 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.75 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOW and FYLD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICOW vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than FYLD's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.24% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.76% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
Drawdowns
ICOW vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and FYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOW | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -44.55% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.00% | -13.05% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.48% | -25.12% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.20% | -1.99% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -8.94% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.29% | +0.30% |
Volatility
ICOW vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 4.82%. This indicates that ICOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICOW | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 4.82% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 9.10% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.12% | 16.41% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 16.30% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 18.09% | +0.44% |