ICOW vs. FIVLX

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) and FIVLX (Fidelity International Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ICOW returned 9.94%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for FIVLX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for FIVLX.

Performance

ICOW vs. FIVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than FIVLX's 7.79% return.

ICOW

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: -3.31%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 31.02%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 9.94%
• 10Y*: —

FIVLX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 7.79%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 25.33%
• 3Y*: 20.50%
• 5Y*: 12.80%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOW vs. FIVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF	12.39%	36.95%	-2.59%	18.94%	-7.98%	11.52%	7.20%	17.91%	-16.09%	16.93%
FIVLX Fidelity International Value Fund	7.79%	43.67%	5.33%	19.27%	-7.99%	14.89%	3.36%	18.92%	-17.17%	5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOW and FIVLX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017	0.86

The correlation between ICOW and FIVLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ICOW vs. FIVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOW

ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 73
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FIVLX

FIVLX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FIVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FIVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FIVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FIVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FIVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOW vs. FIVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICOW	FIVLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.57	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	2.24	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.28	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	2.26	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.28	8.25	+5.03

ICOW vs. FIVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the FIVLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOW and FIVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICOW vs. FIVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, smaller than the maximum FIVLX drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and FIVLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICOW	FIVLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.49%	-65.21%	+21.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.02%	-10.44%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.81%	-14.48%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.79%	-27.49%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-0.72%	-4.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-17.03%	+9.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	2.86%	-0.52%

Volatility

ICOW vs. FIVLX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) at 4.51%. This indicates that ICOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICOW	FIVLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	4.51%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.73%	12.26%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	14.99%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.78%	16.62%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	17.91%	+0.59%

ICOW vs. FIVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FIVLX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICOW vs. FIVLX - Dividend Comparison

ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than FIVLX's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIVLX Fidelity International Value Fund	2.16%	2.32%	2.90%	2.06%	1.85%	4.35%	1.74%	3.54%	3.33%	0.15%	2.71%	1.44%
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF	2.27%	3.03%	4.39%	3.61%	5.26%	2.11%	2.46%	3.10%	2.61%	0.80%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICOW and FIVLX in my portfolio?

ICOW and FIVLX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICOW or FIVLX?

ICOW has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to FIVLX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs FIVLX's -65.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.