PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ODDS vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ODDS vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ODDS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ODDS returned 7.66%/yr vs 64.17%/yr for SMH. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

ODDS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -16.40% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.

ODDS

1D
-2.39%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-16.40%
6M
-17.80%
1Y
-13.71%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

SMH

1D
0.90%
1M
25.87%
YTD
77.13%
6M
75.61%
1Y
157.20%
3Y*
64.17%
5Y*
39.21%
10Y*
37.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ODDS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF		-16.40%16.71%27.61%25.03%-14.96%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		77.13%49.17%39.10%73.38%-14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ODDS and SMH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between ODDS and SMH has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ODDS vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ODDS
SMH

Consumer Cyclical

49.9%

-

Communication Services

44.0%

-

Technology

6.1%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ODDS
49.9%
SMH

-

Communication Services

ODDS
44.0%
SMH

-

Technology

ODDS
6.1%
SMH
100.0%

Basic Materials

ODDS

-

SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

ODDS

-

SMH

-

Energy

ODDS

-

SMH

-

Financial Services

ODDS

-

SMH

-

Healthcare

ODDS

-

SMH

-

Industrials

ODDS

-

SMH

-

Real Estate

ODDS

-

SMH

-

Utilities

ODDS

-

SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

Often compared with ODDS:
ODDS vs. BETZODDS vs. ESPOODDS vs. VOOODDS vs. TIMEODDS vs. FSRPXODDS vs. DSCGXODDS vs. GAMR
Often compared with SMH:
SMH vs. SOXXSMH vs. QQQSMH vs. VGTSMH vs. FSELXSMH vs. SPYSMH vs. SMHXSMH vs. XLK

Return for Risk

ODDS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ODDS
ODDS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ODDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ODDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ODDS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ODDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ODDS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ODDS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ODDSSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.68
5.19

-5.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.82
5.22

-6.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.72

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

10.59

-10.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

40.63

-41.32

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ODDS vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ODDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ODDS and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ODDSSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

5.19

-5.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.13

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.16

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.34

-0.06

Drawdowns

ODDS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and SMH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ODDSSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.09%

-84.96%

+49.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.09%

-14.93%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.09%

-35.74%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-45.30%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-45.30%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.27%

0.00%

-30.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-41.09%

+31.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.81%

3.89%

+15.92%

Volatility

ODDS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) is 4.69%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that ODDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ODDSSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

11.47%

-6.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

24.29%

-8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.36%

30.56%

-10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.87%

35.01%

-10.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

32.57%

-7.70%

ODDS vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ODDS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF		2.91%2.59%0.56%0.66%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

ODDS and SMH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to ODDS (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 64.17% vs 7.66% for ODDS. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ODDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 64.17% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for ODDS.

ODDS has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.

ODDS is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ODDS and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer