ODDS vs. TIME
ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ODDS is passively managed, while TIME is actively managed. Over the past year, ODDS returned -19.58% vs 18.44% for TIME. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ODDS charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.
Performance
ODDS vs. TIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ODDS achieves a -18.34% return, which is significantly lower than TIME's 6.28% return.
ODDS
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -18.34%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -19.58%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIME
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 18.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ODDS vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | -18.34% | 16.71% | 18.15% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 6.28% | 10.17% | 5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ODDS and TIME is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ODDS and TIME shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ODDS vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ODDS
TIME
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
ODDS
TIME
Communication Services
ODDS
TIME
Technology
ODDS
TIME
Basic Materials
ODDS
-
TIME
Consumer Defensive
ODDS
-
TIME
Energy
ODDS
-
TIME
Financial Services
ODDS
-
TIME
Healthcare
ODDS
-
TIME
Industrials
ODDS
-
TIME
Real Estate
ODDS
-
TIME
-
Utilities
ODDS
-
TIME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ODDS vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank
ODDS
TIME
ODDS vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ODDS | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.23 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 1.41 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 5.10 | -6.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ODDS vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ODDS drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ODDS and TIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ODDS | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -24.26% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.09% | -13.09% | -22.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.89% | -3.94% | -27.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -5.53% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.90% | 3.63% | +17.27% |
Volatility
ODDS vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) at 5.23%. This indicates that ODDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ODDS | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 5.23% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.66% | 11.10% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 13.98% | +6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 17.73% | +7.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 17.73% | +7.13% |
ODDS vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
ODDS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ODDS vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison
ODDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than TIME's 9.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | 0.75% | 2.59% | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.42% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.43% | 10.02% | 15.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ODDS and TIME have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ODDS has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to TIME (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ODDS dropped -35.09% vs TIME's -24.26%.
On 1-year performance, TIME leads with 18.44% vs -19.58% for ODDS. On fees, ODDS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TIME has performed better with a 18.44% return vs -19.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ODDS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.
TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.43%, compared with 0.75% for ODDS.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ODDS and 1.00% for TIME.
TIME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ODDS and TIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer