ICOW vs. GSIE
ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index while GSIE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICOW returned 9.94%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for GSIE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.
Performance
ICOW vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than GSIE's 8.00% return.
ICOW
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 31.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIE
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
ICOW vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 12.39% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.93% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 8.00% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 7.45% | 22.83% | -13.40% | 9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOW and GSIE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ICOW and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
ICOW vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICOW
GSIE
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ICOW
GSIE
Energy
ICOW
GSIE
Consumer Cyclical
ICOW
GSIE
Communication Services
ICOW
GSIE
Consumer Defensive
ICOW
GSIE
Technology
ICOW
GSIE
Healthcare
ICOW
GSIE
Basic Materials
ICOW
GSIE
Financial Services
ICOW
-
GSIE
Real Estate
ICOW
-
GSIE
Utilities
ICOW
-
GSIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICOW vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank
ICOW
GSIE
ICOW vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICOW | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.27 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 2.02 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | 7.64 | +5.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICOW vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than GSIE's maximum drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and GSIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOW | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -34.63% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -10.76% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -13.07% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.79% | -29.97% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -0.82% | -4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -6.04% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.84% | -0.50% |
Volatility
ICOW vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) at 4.62%. This indicates that ICOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICOW | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 4.62% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 12.12% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 14.55% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 16.12% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 16.75% | +1.75% |
ICOW vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICOW vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison
ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than GSIE's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.49% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICOW and GSIE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to GSIE (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs GSIE's -34.63%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 9.94% vs 8.84% for GSIE. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 2.27% for ICOW.
ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.25% for GSIE.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICOW and GSIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer