PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOW vs. GSIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOW vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than GSIE's 8.00% return.


ICOW

1D
-2.01%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
12.39%
6M
13.42%
1Y
31.02%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*

GSIE

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.23%
YTD
8.00%
6M
9.94%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOW vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
12.39%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%17.91%-16.09%16.93%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
8.00%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.45%22.83%-13.40%9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOW and GSIE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.86

The correlation between ICOW and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICOW vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICOW
GSIE

Industrials

29.1%
18.9%

Energy

21.3%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
8.7%

Communication Services

8.7%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
7.5%

Technology

7.8%
9.9%

Healthcare

6.7%
9.3%

Basic Materials

5.6%
6.2%

Financial Services

-

26.4%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Industrials

ICOW
29.1%
GSIE
18.9%

Energy

ICOW
21.3%
GSIE
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ICOW
12.7%
GSIE
8.7%

Communication Services

ICOW
8.7%
GSIE
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

ICOW
8.1%
GSIE
7.5%

Technology

ICOW
7.8%
GSIE
9.9%

Healthcare

ICOW
6.7%
GSIE
9.3%

Basic Materials

ICOW
5.6%
GSIE
6.2%

Financial Services

ICOW

-

GSIE
26.4%

Real Estate

ICOW

-

GSIE
1.2%

Utilities

ICOW

-

GSIE
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOW vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOW vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICOWGSIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

2.02

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

7.64

+5.64

ICOW vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the GSIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOW and GSIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICOW vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than GSIE's maximum drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and GSIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOWGSIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.49%

-34.63%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-10.76%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-13.07%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

-29.97%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

-0.82%

-4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-6.04%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.84%

-0.50%

Volatility

ICOW vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) at 4.62%. This indicates that ICOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOWGSIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

4.62%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

12.12%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

14.55%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.12%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

16.75%

+1.75%

ICOW vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICOW vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than GSIE's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.49%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.27%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICOW and GSIE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOW has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to GSIE (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs GSIE's -34.63%.

On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 9.94% vs 8.84% for GSIE. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 2.27% for ICOW.

ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.25% for GSIE.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOW and GSIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer