NVDQ vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDQ returned -69.65% vs 77.80% for MSTZ. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.

Performance

NVDQ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a -38.57% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -49.10% return.

NVDQ

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -23.21%
• YTD: -38.57%
• 6M: -41.67%
• 1Y: -69.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: 84.18%
• YTD: -49.10%
• 6M: -27.85%
• 1Y: 77.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDQ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-38.57%	-74.63%	-35.71%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-49.10%	-38.95%	-94.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and MSTZ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDQ	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	0.56	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.87	1.65	-3.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.21	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	0.92	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	1.93	-3.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDQ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDQ	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.03	0.56	-1.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.89	-0.53	-0.36

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDQ	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.45%	-99.36%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.67%	-84.89%	+11.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.38%	-98.21%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.22%	-94.40%	+6.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.77%	40.54%	+8.23%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) is 25.78%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.72%. This indicates that NVDQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDQ	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.78%	37.72%	-11.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.89%	125.30%	-73.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.77%	140.15%	-72.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.47%	170.19%	-74.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.47%	170.19%	-74.72%

NVDQ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDQ and MSTZ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.

Dividends

NVDQ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.42%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDQ and MSTZ in my portfolio?

NVDQ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDQ or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (37.72%) compared to NVDQ (25.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDQ dropped -99.45% vs MSTZ's -99.36%.

Which ETF is better, NVDQ or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 77.80% vs -69.65% for NVDQ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 25.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDQ or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 77.80% return vs -69.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDQ or MSTZ?

NVDQ and MSTZ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDQ or MSTZ?

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between NVDQ and MSTZ?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and REX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.