NUKZ vs. KULR
NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 31.62% vs -60.49% for KULR. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NUKZ vs. KULR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 26.01% return.
NUKZ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 31.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KULR
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- -60.49%
- 3Y*
- -11.82%
- 5Y*
- -29.09%
- 10Y*
- —
NUKZ vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 7.72% | 56.57% | 62.98% |
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 26.01% | -89.58% | 1,769.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKZ and KULR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.40 |
The correlation between NUKZ and KULR shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKZ vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank
NUKZ
KULR
NUKZ vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUKZ | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.94 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | -0.76 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.79 | -0.99 | +5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUKZ | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | -0.57 | +1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | -0.11 | +1.74 |
Drawdowns
NUKZ vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and KULR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKZ | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -97.23% | +64.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.51% | -79.80% | +63.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -94.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -90.29% | +80.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -66.23% | +60.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 60.84% | -54.22% |
Volatility
NUKZ vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) is 10.20%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 47.09%. This indicates that NUKZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKZ | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 47.09% | -36.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.61% | 76.46% | -53.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.26% | 106.05% | -75.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 126.05% | -93.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 126.51% | -93.69% |
Dividends
NUKZ vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison
NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKZ and KULR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to NUKZ (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs KULR's -97.23%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUKZ and KULR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer