NUKZ vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
NUKZ and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUKZ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. Both NUKZ and NLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NUKZ or NLR.
Correlation
The correlation between NUKZ and NLR is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NUKZ vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NUKZ:
28.11%
NLR:
28.37%
NUKZ:
-14.57%
NLR:
-66.96%
NUKZ:
0.00%
NLR:
-4.61%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 17.33% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 12.53% return.
NUKZ
17.33%
15.34%
43.33%
N/A
N/A
N/A
NLR
12.53%
11.42%
16.37%
24.61%
15.54%
9.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUKZ vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NUKZ vs. NLR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NUKZ
NLR
NUKZ vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
NUKZ vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than NLR's 0.67% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 0.67% | 0.75% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
NUKZ vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -66.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and NLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NUKZ vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 11.25% compared to VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) at 9.89%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.