NUKZ vs. URAN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN).

NUKZ and URAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUKZ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. URAN is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2024. Both NUKZ and URAN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NUKZ vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NUKZ vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	3.57%	56.57%	11.54%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	4.59%	49.05%	4.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than URAN's 4.59% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: 3.64%
• 1M: -10.35%
• YTD: 3.57%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 74.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URAN

• 1D: 4.31%
• 1M: -12.32%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 6M: -3.06%
• 1Y: 70.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.

NUKZ

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF

URAN

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 94
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 91
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 83
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUKZ	URAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.76	+0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.37	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.30	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	2.93	+1.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	6.74	+4.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUKZ vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the URAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and URAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUKZ	URAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.76	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	0.97	+0.77

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and URAN is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than URAN's 2.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.88%	0.91%	0.09%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.45%	2.56%	0.21%

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, roughly equal to the maximum URAN drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and URAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	URAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-31.96%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.51%	-23.89%	+7.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.55%	-20.61%	+9.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.09%	-9.98%	+3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.25%	10.40%	-4.15%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) is 10.20%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 13.10%. This indicates that NUKZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	URAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.20%	13.10%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.54%	30.68%	-9.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.75%	40.32%	-8.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.60%	39.24%	-6.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.60%	39.24%	-6.64%