NUKZ vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
NUKZ and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUKZ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. Both NUKZ and URA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NUKZ or URA.
Correlation
The correlation between NUKZ and URA is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NUKZ vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NUKZ:
27.61%
URA:
35.59%
NUKZ:
-14.57%
URA:
-93.54%
NUKZ:
-3.20%
URA:
-69.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 4.67% return.
NUKZ
10.92%
11.43%
37.68%
N/A
N/A
N/A
URA
4.67%
3.56%
2.09%
-6.39%
24.87%
6.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUKZ vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NUKZ vs. URA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NUKZ
URA
NUKZ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
NUKZ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than URA's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 2.73% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
Drawdowns
NUKZ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NUKZ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 9.21%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.