PortfoliosLab logo
NUKZ vs. URA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and URA is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NUKZ vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NUKZ:

1.27

URA:

0.06

Sortino Ratio

NUKZ:

1.74

URA:

0.34

Omega Ratio

NUKZ:

1.24

URA:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

NUKZ:

1.42

URA:

0.02

Martin Ratio

NUKZ:

4.00

URA:

0.08

Ulcer Index

NUKZ:

11.69%

URA:

17.04%

Daily Std Dev

NUKZ:

38.49%

URA:

40.67%

Max Drawdown

NUKZ:

-33.03%

URA:

-93.54%

Current Drawdown

NUKZ:

-1.80%

URA:

-65.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 23.80% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 19.53% return.


NUKZ

YTD

23.80%

1M

18.64%

6M

8.76%

1Y

48.44%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

URA

YTD

19.53%

1M

23.88%

6M

1.63%

1Y

2.06%

3Y*

17.03%

5Y*

27.70%

10Y*

6.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF

Global X Uranium ETF

NUKZ vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NUKZ vs. URA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NUKZ is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

URA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of URA is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of URA is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of URA is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of URA is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of URA is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of URA is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NUKZ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and URA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NUKZ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than URA's 2.39% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.07%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
2.39%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.85%1.69%1.66%0.45%2.03%7.28%1.96%4.28%

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and URA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NUKZ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) is 7.54%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that NUKZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...