KULR vs. FBTC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock, while FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Over the past year, KULR returned -42.15% vs -35.90% for FBTC. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KULR vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 76.69% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -23.31% return.

KULR

• 1D: 13.70%
• 1M: 95.15%
• YTD: 76.69%
• 6M: 64.98%
• 1Y: -42.15%
• 3Y*: -0.75%
• 5Y*: -25.51%
• 10Y*: —

FBTC

• 1D: -6.01%
• 1M: -14.41%
• YTD: -23.31%
• 6M: -26.33%
• 1Y: -35.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KULR vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	76.69%	-89.58%	1,839.89%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-23.31%	-6.56%	99.56%

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and FBTC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.30

The correlation between KULR and FBTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KULR vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 26
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KULR vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KULR	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	-0.83	+0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	-1.09	+1.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.88	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	-0.73	+0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	-1.28	+0.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KULR vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KULR	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41	-0.83	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.32	-0.40

Drawdowns

KULR vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	KULR	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.23%	-49.33%	-47.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.80%	-49.33%	-30.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.38%	-46.58%	-39.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.19%	-15.95%	-50.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	60.40%	28.24%	+32.16%

Volatility

KULR vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 39.12% compared to Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) at 9.67%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KULR	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.12%	9.67%	+29.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.91%	34.77%	+40.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.34%	43.53%	+60.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.10%	50.14%	+75.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.40%	50.14%	+76.26%

Dividends

KULR vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither KULR nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KULR and FBTC in my portfolio?

KULR and FBTC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KULR or FBTC?

KULR has higher volatility (39.12%) compared to FBTC (9.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs FBTC's -49.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KULR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.