KULR vs. FBTC
KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock, while FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Over the past year, KULR returned -49.52% vs -44.55% for FBTC. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KULR vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a -10.47% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -28.23% return.
KULR
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -31.17%
- 6M
- -25.56%
- YTD
- -10.47%
- 1Y
- -49.52%
- 3Y*
- -29.99%
- 5Y*
- -30.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.87%
FBTC
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- -25.08%
- YTD
- -28.23%
- 1Y
- -44.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $183.96M | $200.45M | $239.07M | |
| $2.72M | $3.64M | $8.75M |
KULR vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | -10.47% | -89.58% | 1,897.75% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -28.23% | -6.56% | 94.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between KULR and FBTC is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, KULR and FBTC have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KULR vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank
KULR
FBTC
KULR vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KULR | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.83 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.87 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.34 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KULR vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and FBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KULR | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -53.35% | -43.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.00% | -53.35% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.10% | -50.01% | -43.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.66% | -18.17% | -48.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.49% | 34.63% | +3.86% |
Volatility
KULR vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 25.82% compared to Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) at 9.07%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KULR | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.82% | 9.07% | +16.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.93% | 33.70% | +40.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.80% | 44.36% | +54.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.59% | 49.47% | +77.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.59% | 49.47% | +77.12% |
Dividends
KULR vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison
Neither KULR nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KULR and FBTC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (25.82%) compared to FBTC (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs FBTC's -53.35%.
KULR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KULR and FBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer