KULR vs. CLSK

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) and CLSK (CleanSpark, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — KULR in Electronic Components, CLSK in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, KULR returned -25.51%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for CLSK. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KULR vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KULR having a 76.69% return and CLSK slightly lower at 73.72%.

KULR

• 1D: 13.70%
• 1M: 95.15%
• YTD: 76.69%
• 6M: 64.98%
• 1Y: -42.15%
• 3Y*: -0.75%
• 5Y*: -25.51%
• 10Y*: —

CLSK

• 1D: -6.54%
• 1M: 44.45%
• YTD: 73.72%
• 6M: 28.23%
• 1Y: 104.18%
• 3Y*: 61.80%
• 5Y*: 1.21%
• 10Y*: -5.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KULR vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	76.69%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	87.76%	-2.00%	-42.31%	73.33%
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc.	73.72%	9.88%	-16.50%	440.69%	-78.57%	-67.23%	442.99%	-73.90%	-29.31%

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and CLSK is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018	0.24

Over the past year, KULR and CLSK have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS KULR : -$1.57 CLSK : -$2.24
PS Ratio KULR : 12.77 CLSK : 5.31
Total Revenue (TTM) KULR : $16.17M CLSK : $739.88M
Gross Profit (TTM) KULR : $770.97K CLSK : $306.93M
EBITDA (TTM) KULR : -$60.59M CLSK : -$103.41M

Return for Risk

KULR vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 26
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CLSK

CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 70
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KULR vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KULR	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	1.19	-1.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	1.96	-1.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.23	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	1.60	-2.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	2.69	-3.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KULR vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and CLSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KULR	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41	1.19	-1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.01	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	-0.03	-0.05

Drawdowns

KULR vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and CLSK.

Drawdown Indicators

	KULR	CLSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.23%	-98.56%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.80%	-64.74%	-15.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.74%	-71.28%	-23.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.86%	-92.00%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.38%	-75.92%	-10.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.19%	-69.48%	+3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	60.40%	38.60%	+21.80%

Volatility

KULR vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 39.12% compared to CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) at 20.72%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KULR	CLSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.12%	20.72%	+18.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.91%	62.70%	+12.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.34%	88.40%	+15.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.10%	100.72%	+25.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.40%	183.26%	-56.86%

Dividends

KULR vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither KULR nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KULR and CLSK in my portfolio?

KULR and CLSK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KULR or CLSK?

KULR has higher volatility (39.12%) compared to CLSK (20.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs CLSK's -98.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.