PortfoliosLab logo
KULR vs. CLSK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and CLSK is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

KULR vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.00%
-68.73%
KULR
CLSK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KULR:

0.95

CLSK:

-0.52

Sortino Ratio

KULR:

2.82

CLSK:

-0.40

Omega Ratio

KULR:

1.32

CLSK:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

KULR:

1.68

CLSK:

-0.58

Martin Ratio

KULR:

3.56

CLSK:

-1.19

Ulcer Index

KULR:

44.94%

CLSK:

44.33%

Daily Std Dev

KULR:

168.33%

CLSK:

101.19%

Max Drawdown

KULR:

-97.23%

CLSK:

-98.56%

Current Drawdown

KULR:

-71.87%

CLSK:

-87.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KULR:

$383.93M

CLSK:

$2.53B

EPS

KULR:

-$0.09

CLSK:

$0.00

PS Ratio

KULR:

35.76

CLSK:

5.41

PB Ratio

KULR:

6.69

CLSK:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

KULR:

$8.99M

CLSK:

$355.69M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KULR:

$4.97M

CLSK:

$120.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

KULR:

-$10.33M

CLSK:

$109.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a -61.97% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's -2.17% return.


KULR

YTD

-61.97%

1M

-7.53%

6M

380.43%

1Y

190.14%

5Y*

-1.01%

10Y*

N/A

CLSK

YTD

-2.17%

1M

25.31%

6M

-20.90%

1Y

-53.15%

5Y*

41.36%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KULR vs. CLSK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KULR is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KULR is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KULR is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KULR is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KULR is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KULR is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSK is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSK is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KULR vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for KULR, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
KULR: 0.95
CLSK: -0.56
The chart of Sortino ratio for KULR, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
KULR: 2.82
CLSK: -0.53
The chart of Omega ratio for KULR, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
KULR: 1.32
CLSK: 0.94
The chart of Calmar ratio for KULR, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
KULR: 1.68
CLSK: -0.62
The chart of Martin ratio for KULR, currently valued at 3.56, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
KULR: 3.56
CLSK: -1.34

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and CLSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.95
-0.56
KULR
CLSK

Dividends

KULR vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither KULR nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%

Drawdowns

KULR vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and CLSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-71.87%
-87.58%
KULR
CLSK

Volatility

KULR vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) is 27.34%, while CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a volatility of 32.69%. This indicates that KULR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
27.34%
32.69%
KULR
CLSK

Financials

KULR vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items