KULR vs. QQQ
KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, KULR returned -25.51%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KULR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 76.69% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.62% return.
KULR
- 1D
- 13.70%
- 1M
- 95.15%
- YTD
- 76.69%
- 6M
- 64.98%
- 1Y
- -42.15%
- 3Y*
- -0.75%
- 5Y*
- -25.51%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
KULR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 76.69% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -42.31% | 73.33% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -13.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between KULR and QQQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, KULR and QQQ have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KULR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
KULR
QQQ
KULR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KULR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 2.73 | -3.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | 3.55 | -3.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.47 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 3.71 | -4.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 14.30 | -15.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KULR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 2.73 | -3.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.83 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.41 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
KULR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KULR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -82.97% | -14.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.80% | -11.96% | -67.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.74% | -22.77% | -71.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.86% | -35.12% | -61.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.38% | 0.00% | -86.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.19% | -32.79% | -33.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.40% | 3.11% | +57.29% |
Volatility
KULR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 39.12% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KULR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.12% | 4.48% | +34.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.91% | 12.11% | +62.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.34% | 15.95% | +88.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.10% | 22.39% | +103.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.40% | 22.30% | +104.10% |
Dividends
KULR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KULR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (39.12%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KULR and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer