KULR vs. NAK
KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) and NAK (Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.) are both stocks. KULR operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while NAK operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, KULR returned -30.48%/yr vs 26.49%/yr for NAK. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KULR vs. NAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a -10.47% return, which is significantly higher than NAK's -28.93% return.
KULR
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -31.17%
- 6M
- -25.56%
- YTD
- -10.47%
- 1Y
- -49.52%
- 3Y*
- -29.99%
- 5Y*
- -30.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.87%
NAK
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -24.73%
- 6M
- -31.37%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 1Y
- 86.67%
- 3Y*
- 67.11%
- 5Y*
- 26.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.72M | $3.64M | $8.75M | |
| $7.09M | $8.10M | $13.18M |
KULR vs. NAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | -10.47% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -42.31% | 136.36% |
NAK Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. | -28.93% | 238.78% | 79.86% | 46.42% | -32.31% | 1.30% | -25.12% | -24.46% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between KULR and NAK is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, KULR and NAK have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
KULR:
$122.58M
NAK:
$784.44M
KULR:
-$1.53
NAK:
-CA$0.19
KULR:
0.87
NAK:
60.87
KULR:
$16.17M
NAK:
CA$0.00
KULR:
$770.97K
NAK:
-CA$85.85K
KULR:
-$60.59M
NAK:
-CA$99.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KULR vs. NAK — Risk / Return Rank
KULR
NAK
KULR vs. NAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KULR | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.22 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.32 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 2.54 | -3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KULR vs. NAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, roughly equal to the maximum NAK drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and NAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KULR | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -99.01% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.00% | -59.06% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.74% | -67.68% | -27.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.86% | -67.68% | -29.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.10% | -93.36% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.66% | -74.03% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.49% | 30.55% | +7.94% |
Volatility
KULR vs. NAK - Volatility Comparison
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 25.82% compared to Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) at 21.79%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KULR | NAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.82% | 21.79% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.93% | 77.20% | -3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.80% | 97.66% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.59% | 84.34% | +42.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.59% | 97.03% | +29.56% |
Dividends
KULR vs. NAK - Dividend Comparison
Neither KULR nor NAK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KULR vs. NAK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KULR and NAK have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (25.82%) compared to NAK (21.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs NAK's -99.01%.
NAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KULR and NAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer