PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUEM vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUEM vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUEM achieves a 19.14% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return.


NUEM

1D
-1.30%
1M
3.53%
YTD
19.14%
6M
21.09%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
19.13%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*

EEMO

1D
-1.32%
1M
18.59%
YTD
40.25%
6M
41.33%
1Y
57.41%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUEM vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
19.14%27.12%9.73%8.57%-19.74%-1.08%24.09%16.67%-17.26%18.50%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
40.25%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%24.13%

Correlation

The correlation between NUEM and EEMO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.79

The correlation between NUEM and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUEM vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUEM
EEMO

Technology

31.5%
43.8%

Financial Services

18.2%
18.0%

Industrials

11.9%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

8.5%
12.9%

Communication Services

8.2%
1.5%

Energy

3.3%
2.5%

Healthcare

2.9%
3.0%

Utilities

1.9%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.5%

Technology

NUEM
31.5%
EEMO
43.8%

Financial Services

NUEM
18.2%
EEMO
18.0%

Industrials

NUEM
11.9%
EEMO
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

NUEM
11.3%
EEMO
3.2%

Basic Materials

NUEM
8.5%
EEMO
12.9%

Communication Services

NUEM
8.2%
EEMO
1.5%

Energy

NUEM
3.3%
EEMO
2.5%

Healthcare

NUEM
2.9%
EEMO
3.0%

Utilities

NUEM
1.9%
EEMO
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

NUEM
1.6%
EEMO
1.2%

Real Estate

NUEM
0.7%
EEMO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUEM vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUEM
NUEM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NUEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NUEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUEM vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUEMEEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.91

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

15.67

-2.72

NUEM vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUEM and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUEMEEMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.36

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.37

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.13

+0.28

Drawdowns

NUEM vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUEM and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUEMEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-48.47%

+8.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-14.75%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-26.06%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.10%

-34.03%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.32%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-20.17%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.67%

-0.39%

Volatility

NUEM vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) is 6.76%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that NUEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUEMEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

14.32%

-7.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

22.10%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

24.45%

-5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

19.33%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

21.59%

-1.41%

NUEM vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUEM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUEM vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

NUEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than EEMO's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.64%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.00%3.58%1.95%2.37%1.90%2.45%1.26%1.98%2.05%0.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUEM and EEMO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to NUEM (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUEM dropped -39.48% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 5-year performance, EEMO leads with 7.19% vs 5.39% for NUEM. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, NUEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 7.19% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NUEM.

NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.64% for EEMO.

NUEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. NUEM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NUEM and 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUEM and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer