PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUEM vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUEM vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUEM achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 13.82% return.


NUEM

1D
0.15%
1M
3.92%
YTD
20.71%
6M
22.72%
1Y
44.96%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*

VWO

1D
1.27%
1M
3.73%
YTD
13.82%
6M
15.26%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUEM vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
20.71%27.12%9.73%8.57%-19.74%-1.08%24.09%16.67%-17.26%18.50%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
13.82%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%14.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NUEM and VWO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.90

The correlation between NUEM and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUEM vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUEM
VWO

Technology

31.5%
29.6%

Financial Services

18.2%
19.5%

Industrials

11.9%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
10.7%

Basic Materials

8.5%
8.0%

Communication Services

8.2%
7.1%

Energy

3.3%
4.6%

Healthcare

2.9%
3.9%

Utilities

1.9%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
3.7%

Real Estate

0.7%
2.2%

Technology

NUEM
31.5%
VWO
29.6%

Financial Services

NUEM
18.2%
VWO
19.5%

Industrials

NUEM
11.9%
VWO
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NUEM
11.3%
VWO
10.7%

Basic Materials

NUEM
8.5%
VWO
8.0%

Communication Services

NUEM
8.2%
VWO
7.1%

Energy

NUEM
3.3%
VWO
4.6%

Healthcare

NUEM
2.9%
VWO
3.9%

Utilities

NUEM
1.9%
VWO
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

NUEM
1.6%
VWO
3.7%

Real Estate

NUEM
0.7%
VWO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUEM vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUEM
NUEM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NUEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NUEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUEM vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUEMVWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

2.09

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

2.88

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

3.03

+0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.82

10.94

+2.88

NUEM vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUEM and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUEMVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.09

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.33

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.27

+0.15

Drawdowns

NUEM vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUEM and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUEMVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-67.68%

+28.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-11.17%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-17.37%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.10%

-32.64%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-15.82%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.09%

+0.19%

Volatility

NUEM vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 5.41%. This indicates that NUEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUEMVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

5.41%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

13.13%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.62%

15.83%

+2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

17.36%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

19.20%

+0.98%

NUEM vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUEM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUEM vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

NUEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than VWO's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.97%3.58%1.95%2.37%1.90%2.45%1.26%1.98%2.05%0.62%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.37%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NUEM and VWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NUEM has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to VWO (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUEM dropped -39.48% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 5-year performance, NUEM leads with 5.91% vs 5.66% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUEM has performed better with a 5.91% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NUEM.

NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 2.37% for VWO.

NUEM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NUEM and 0.08% for VWO.

NUEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUEM and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer