PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUEM vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUEM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUEM achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 21.07% return.


NUEM

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.17%
6M
5.86%
YTD
12.56%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.41%

SPMO

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.64%
6M
20.51%
YTD
21.07%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
37.36%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
19.57%
ALL TIME*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.34M$1.71M$1.25M
$331.54M$346.70M$350.59M

NUEM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
12.56%27.12%9.73%8.57%-19.74%-1.08%24.09%16.67%-17.26%18.50%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
21.07%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%17.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NUEM and SPMO is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.56

The correlation between NUEM and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NUEM vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUEM
SPMO

Technology

42.3%
53.7%

Financial Services

17.5%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
1.2%

Industrials

7.5%
11.2%

Communication Services

7.2%
7.4%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.9%

Energy

2.8%
3.3%

Healthcare

2.5%
6.9%

Utilities

1.9%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.1%

Technology

NUEM
42.3%
SPMO
53.7%

Financial Services

NUEM
17.5%
SPMO
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NUEM
9.3%
SPMO
1.2%

Industrials

NUEM
7.5%
SPMO
11.2%

Communication Services

NUEM
7.2%
SPMO
7.4%

Basic Materials

NUEM
6.6%
SPMO
1.9%

Energy

NUEM
2.8%
SPMO
3.3%

Healthcare

NUEM
2.5%
SPMO
6.9%

Utilities

NUEM
1.9%
SPMO
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

NUEM
1.8%
SPMO
4.2%

Real Estate

NUEM
0.6%
SPMO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUEM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUEM
NUEM Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NUEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUEM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NUEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUEM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUEMSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.63

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

5.93

-0.12

NUEM vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUEM and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUEM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUEM and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUEMSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-30.95%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.91%

-15.64%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-20.13%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.54%

-22.74%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-11.03%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.86%

-4.62%

-10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

4.29%

-0.03%

Volatility

NUEM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM) is 8.86%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that NUEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUEMSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

10.53%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.22%

21.52%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.33%

23.90%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

20.60%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

20.92%

-0.45%

NUEM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUEM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUEM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

NUEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than SPMO's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUEM
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.18%3.58%1.95%2.37%1.90%2.45%1.26%1.98%2.05%0.62%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.73%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUEM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to NUEM (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUEM dropped -39.48% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.21% vs 5.24% for NUEM. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, NUEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.21% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NUEM.

NUEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.73% for SPMO.

NUEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. NUEM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG Emerging Markets, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NUEM and 0.13% for SPMO.

NUEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUEM and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer