NUDG vs. SCDL

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

NUDG (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class) and SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - NUDG is a Dividend fund actively managed by Nuveen, while SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%). NUDG is actively managed, while SCDL is passively managed. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NUDG charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SCDL.

Performance

NUDG vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NUDG

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 3.12%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SCDL

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 7.79%
• 6M: 30.91%
• YTD: 46.85%
• 1Y: 50.32%
• 3Y*: 20.39%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class	$504.41	$455.53	$412.95K
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	$30.49K	$28.35K	$21.70K

NUDG vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class	0.95%
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDG and SCDL is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	0.36

Return for Risk

NUDG vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCDL

SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 90
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDG vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUDG	SCDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.54	—

Drawdowns

NUDG vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDG drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDG and SCDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUDG	SCDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-34.87%	+32.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.79%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	0.00%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.05%	-11.71%	+10.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NUDG	SCDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	21.84%	-11.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.91%	28.99%	-19.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.91%	28.76%	-18.85%

NUDG vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUDG vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison

NUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class	0.26%
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUDG and SCDL in my portfolio?

NUDG and SCDL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NUDG or SCDL?

On fees, NUDG is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUDG or SCDL?

NUDG is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUDG or SCDL?

NUDG has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.

What is the main difference between NUDG and SCDL?

NUDG is categorized as Dividend, while SCDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for NUDG and 0.95% for SCDL.