SCDL vs. QLD
SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SCDL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCDL returned 11.62%/yr vs 17.45%/yr for QLD. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCDL vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCDL achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 18.94% return.
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 26.03%
- YTD
- 47.30%
- 1Y
- 61.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.37%
QLD
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- YTD
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 42.18%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 32.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $408.78M | $399.91M | $439.78M | |
| $12.99K | $29.73K | $21.90K |
SCDL vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 47.30% | 2.05% | 14.99% | 0.18% | -13.06% | 52.47% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 18.94% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 40.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDL and QLD is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCDL and QLD has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDL vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
SCDL
QLD
SCDL vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCDL | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.18 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.00 | 1.46 | +4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 4.32 | +11.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCDL vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDL drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDL and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDL | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -83.13% | +48.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -25.13% | +14.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.79% | -42.29% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | -63.68% | +28.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -16.72% | +14.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -18.11% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 8.47% | -4.51% |
Volatility
SCDL vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) is 8.22%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that SCDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDL | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 13.69% | -5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 31.99% | -16.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 38.62% | -16.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 45.76% | -16.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 44.97% | -16.21% |
SCDL vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCDL and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCDL vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCDL and QLD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to SCDL (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDL dropped -34.87% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 5-year performance, QLD leads with 17.45% vs 11.62% for SCDL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SCDL has been the lower-risk option at 8.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLD has performed better with a 17.45% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCDL and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.
SCDL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: UBS and ProShares.
SCDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCDL and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer