NUDG vs. DIVB
NUDG (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both Dividend funds. NUDG is actively managed, while DIVB is passively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NUDG charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.
Performance
NUDG vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUDG
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DIVB
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- YTD
- 23.99%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.15M | $8.80M | $7.06M | |
| $504.41 | $455.53 | $412.95K |
NUDG vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class | 0.95% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUDG and DIVB is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUDG vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank
NUDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVB
NUDG vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUDG | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUDG vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUDG drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDG and DIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUDG | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -36.93% | +34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | 0.00% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -4.93% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
NUDG vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUDG | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 12.31% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.91% | 15.34% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.91% | 18.34% | -8.43% |
NUDG vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUDG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUDG vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison
NUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than DIVB's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% |
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUDG and DIVB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for NUDG.
DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.26% for NUDG.
They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for NUDG and 0.05% for DIVB.
Find the right allocation for NUDG and DIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer