SCDL vs. QQQI
SCDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%), while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. SCDL is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, SCDL returned 61.99% vs 17.94% for QQQI. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SCDL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
SCDL vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCDL achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 6.90% return.
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 26.03%
- YTD
- 47.30%
- 1Y
- 61.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.37%
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 17.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $341.25M | $334.46M | $358.36M | |
| $12.99K | $29.73K | $21.90K |
SCDL vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 47.30% | 2.05% | 12.25% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 6.90% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCDL and QQQI is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SCDL and QQQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCDL vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
SCDL
QQQI
SCDL vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCDL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.18 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.00 | 1.67 | +4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 6.03 | +9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCDL vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCDL drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCDL and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCDL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -20.00% | -14.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -9.61% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -5.92% | +3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -2.27% | -9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 2.67% | +1.29% |
Volatility
SCDL vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 6.53%. This indicates that SCDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCDL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 6.53% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 13.66% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 16.35% | +5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 17.75% | +11.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 17.75% | +11.01% |
SCDL vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCDL vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 14.38% | 13.82% | 12.85% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCDL and QQQI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCDL has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to QQQI (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCDL dropped -34.87% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, SCDL leads with 61.99% vs 17.94% for QQQI. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCDL has performed better with a 61.99% return vs 17.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCDL.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 14.38%, compared with 0.00% for SCDL.
SCDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCDL and 0.68% for QQQI.
SCDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCDL and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer