NUDG vs. NURE

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

NUDG (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class) and NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUDG is a Dividend fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. NUDG is actively managed, while NURE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. NUDG charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NURE.

Performance

NUDG vs. NURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NUDG

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 2.07%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NURE

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.00%
• 6M: 17.43%
• YTD: 19.00%
• 1Y: 14.74%
• 3Y*: 6.63%
• 5Y*: 2.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDG vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class	0.41%
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF	7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDG and NURE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	-0.00

Return for Risk

NUDG vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NURE

NURE Risk / Return Rank: 29
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 26
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDG vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUDG	NURE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.93	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.42	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.62	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.37	—

Drawdowns

NUDG vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDG drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDG and NURE.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUDG	NURE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-46.05%	+43.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-6.18%	+6.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-12.26%	+10.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NUDG	NURE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.79%	16.02%	-5.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.79%	19.69%	-8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.79%	21.76%	-10.97%

NUDG vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUDG vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison

NUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than NURE's 4.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF	4.01%	4.56%	3.51%	3.73%	2.80%	1.34%	3.41%	3.28%	4.11%	3.86%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUDG and NURE in my portfolio?

NUDG and NURE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NUDG or NURE?

On fees, NURE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUDG or NURE?

NURE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for NUDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUDG or NURE?

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.26% for NUDG.

What is the main difference between NUDG and NURE?

NUDG is categorized as Dividend, while NURE is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for NUDG and 0.35% for NURE.