PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDG vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDG vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NUDG

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.07%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RDIV

1D
0.85%
1M
2.78%
6M
13.74%
YTD
16.10%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDG vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUDG and RDIV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDG vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDG vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUDGRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

NUDG vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUDG vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDG drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDG and RDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDGRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-49.97%

+47.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.56%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-5.83%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

Volatility

NUDG vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDGRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

13.36%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.79%

17.47%

-6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.79%

21.84%

-11.05%

NUDG vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDG vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

NUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than RDIV's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUDG
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class
0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.65%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUDG and RDIV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for NUDG.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.26% for NUDG.

NUDG is categorized as Dividend, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for NUDG and 0.39% for RDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDG and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer