PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDG vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDG vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NUDG

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.07%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LVHI

1D
0.51%
1M
2.97%
6M
13.07%
YTD
14.33%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
16.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDG vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUDG and LVHI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDG vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDG vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUDGLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.08

NUDG vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUDG vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDG drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDG and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDGLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-32.31%

+29.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-3.49%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

Volatility

NUDG vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDGLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

9.67%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.79%

11.10%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.79%

13.73%

-2.94%

NUDG vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDG vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

NUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than LVHI's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.66%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%
NUDG
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class
0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUDG and LVHI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for NUDG.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.26% for NUDG.

NUDG is categorized as Dividend, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for NUDG and 0.40% for LVHI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDG and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer