NUDG vs. LVHI
NUDG (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUDG is a Dividend fund actively managed by Nuveen, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. NUDG is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUDG charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
NUDG vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUDG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 13.07%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.41%
- 10Y*
- —
NUDG vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class | 0.41% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUDG and LVHI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUDG vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
NUDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LVHI
NUDG vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class (NUDG) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUDG | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.65 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUDG vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUDG drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDG and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUDG | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -32.31% | +29.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -3.49% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.48% | — |
Volatility
NUDG vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUDG | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.79% | 9.67% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 11.10% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 13.73% | -2.94% |
NUDG vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUDG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUDG vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
NUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than LVHI's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.66% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
NUDG Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF Class | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUDG and LVHI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for NUDG.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.26% for NUDG.
NUDG is categorized as Dividend, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for NUDG and 0.40% for LVHI.
Find the right allocation for NUDG and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer