PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NU vs. LSPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NU vs. LSPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Lightspeed Commerce Inc (LSPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a -30.70% return, which is significantly lower than LSPD's -21.03% return.


NU

1D
-3.09%
1M
-15.94%
YTD
-30.70%
6M
-30.20%
1Y
-4.53%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10Y*

LSPD

1D
3.25%
1M
-3.25%
YTD
-21.03%
6M
-17.33%
1Y
-17.04%
3Y*
-14.08%
5Y*
-33.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NU vs. LSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-30.70%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-9.20%
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc
-21.03%-20.68%-27.44%46.78%-64.63%-11.72%

Correlation

The correlation between NU and LSPD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.43

The correlation between NU and LSPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NU:

$56.96B

LSPD:

$1.33B

EPS

NU:

$0.65

LSPD:

-$1.04

PS Ratio

NU:

3.24

LSPD:

1.08

PB Ratio

NU:

4.52

LSPD:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

NU:

$17.54B

LSPD:

$1.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NU:

$7.67B

LSPD:

$451.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

NU:

$4.14B

LSPD:

-$1.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NU vs. LSPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

LSPD
LSPD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NU vs. LSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Lightspeed Commerce Inc (LSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULSPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.96

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.43

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

-0.76

+0.45

NU vs. LSPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the LSPD Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and LSPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULSPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

-0.40

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.23

+0.28

Drawdowns

NU vs. LSPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, smaller than the maximum LSPD drawdown of -93.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and LSPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULSPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-93.68%

+21.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-39.48%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.58%

-62.75%

+23.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.17%

-92.33%

+54.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.77%

-64.36%

+34.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.69%

22.41%

-7.72%

Volatility

NU vs. LSPD - Volatility Comparison

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Lightspeed Commerce Inc (LSPD) have volatilities of 14.24% and 14.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULSPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.24%

14.90%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.87%

29.27%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.10%

42.85%

-3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.43%

61.75%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.43%

72.37%

-13.94%

Dividends

NU vs. LSPD - Dividend Comparison

Neither NU nor LSPD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NU vs. LSPD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Holdings Ltd. and Lightspeed Commerce Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.98B
286.77M
(NU) Total Revenue
(LSPD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NU vs. LSPD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nu Holdings Ltd. and Lightspeed Commerce Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
40.2%
31.4%
Portfolio components
NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

LSPD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lightspeed Commerce Inc reported a gross profit of 90.13M and revenue of 286.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

LSPD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lightspeed Commerce Inc reported an operating income of -33.49M and revenue of 286.77M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.7%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.

LSPD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lightspeed Commerce Inc reported a net income of -28.17M and revenue of 286.77M, resulting in a net margin of -9.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NU and LSPD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSPD has higher volatility (14.90%) compared to NU (14.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NU dropped -72.07% vs LSPD's -93.68%.

NU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NU and LSPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer