PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSPD vs. QTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LSPD vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lightspeed Commerce Inc (LSPD) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LSPD vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc
-25.99%-20.68%-27.44%46.78%-64.63%-42.56%151.62%-15.04%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
-4.83%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%16.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSPD achieves a -25.99% return, which is significantly lower than QTEC's -4.83% return.


LSPD

1D
-0.22%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
-25.99%
6M
-23.52%
1Y
0.34%
3Y*
-16.18%
5Y*
-32.63%
10Y*

QTEC

1D
1.44%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-4.83%
6M
-5.34%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
18.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSPD vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSPD
LSPD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPD vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lightspeed Commerce Inc (LSPD) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSPDQTECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.01

0.87

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.35

1.41

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.19

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

1.64

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.13

5.03

-4.90

LSPD vs. QTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the QTEC Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPD and QTEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSPDQTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

0.87

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

0.28

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.52

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between LSPD and QTEC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LSPD vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSPD nor QTEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Drawdowns

LSPD vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPD drawdown since its inception was -93.68%, which is greater than QTEC's maximum drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPD and QTEC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LSPDQTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.68%

-58.86%

-34.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.39%

-16.03%

-22.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.68%

-45.54%

-48.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.81%

-11.14%

-81.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.58%

-9.96%

-53.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.34%

5.22%

+12.12%

Volatility

LSPD vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison

Lightspeed Commerce Inc (LSPD) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) at 8.48%. This indicates that LSPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LSPDQTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.51%

8.48%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.77%

18.22%

+13.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.76%

29.51%

+16.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.30%

29.04%

+33.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.02%

27.35%

+45.67%