PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NU vs. 18MF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NU vs. 18MF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NU is traded in USD, while 18MF.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 18MF.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a -27.18% return, which is significantly lower than 18MF.DE's 16.05% return.


NU

1D
0.83%
1M
-5.72%
YTD
-27.18%
6M
-27.87%
1Y
2.44%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10Y*

18MF.DE

1D
3.02%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
16.05%
6M
18.20%
1Y
48.38%
3Y*
33.64%
5Y*
20.87%
10Y*
25.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NU vs. 18MF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-27.18%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-16.62%
18MF.DE
Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF
16.05%14.77%54.76%47.68%-37.13%4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NU and 18MF.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NU vs. 18MF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

18MF.DE
18MF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
18MF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
18MF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
18MF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
18MF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
18MF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NU vs. 18MF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NU18MF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.34

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

3.07

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

11.81

-11.71

NU vs. 18MF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the 18MF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and 18MF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NU vs. 18MF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, which is greater than 18MF.DE's maximum drawdown of -59.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and 18MF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NU18MF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-59.93%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.17%

-15.27%

-22.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.58%

-40.04%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.02%

-4.27%

-30.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.77%

-8.91%

-20.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.36%

3.97%

+11.39%

Volatility

NU vs. 18MF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a higher volatility of 14.80% compared to Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) at 6.51%. This indicates that NU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 18MF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NU18MF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.80%

6.51%

+8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.91%

15.95%

+12.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.77%

22.94%

+15.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.48%

30.78%

+27.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.48%

32.04%

+26.44%

Dividends

NU vs. 18MF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NU nor 18MF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NU and 18MF.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NU and 18MF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer