18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA).
18MF.DE and LQQ.PA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 18MF.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 16, 2009. LQQ.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2006. Both 18MF.DE and LQQ.PA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18MF.DE Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF | -7.00% | 1.66% | 64.13% | 43.13% | -33.43% | 88.19% | 5.29% | 77.81% | -5.75% | 12.05% |
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | -11.12% | 14.16% | 57.02% | 112.33% | -59.20% | 71.22% | 74.17% | 83.28% | -3.57% | 48.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 18MF.DE achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly higher than LQQ.PA's -11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, 18MF.DE has underperformed LQQ.PA with an annualized return of 22.69%, while LQQ.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 29.67% annualized return.
18MF.DE
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -3.37%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 26.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- 22.69%
LQQ.PA
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -11.12%
- 6M
- -8.94%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- 34.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
18MF.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank
18MF.DE
LQQ.PA
18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 18MF.DE | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.73 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.22 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.17 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 3.14 | -1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 10.06 | -4.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 18MF.DE | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.73 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.41 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.75 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.63 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between 18MF.DE and LQQ.PA is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither 18MF.DE nor LQQ.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 18MF.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -75.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18MF.DE and LQQ.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 18MF.DE | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -75.86% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.80% | -21.88% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.90% | -61.21% | +18.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.67% | -61.21% | +1.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -17.32% | +5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -15.84% | +5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 6.84% | -2.21% |
Volatility
18MF.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) is 7.39%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that 18MF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 18MF.DE | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 10.13% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 23.30% | -5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.36% | 39.03% | -4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 39.74% | -8.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 38.79% | -6.22% |