PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOW vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOW vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOW achieves a -37.96% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 9.90% return. Over the past 10 years, NOW has outperformed VOT with an annualized return of 20.67%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.41% annualized return.


NOW

1D
-0.46%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
-37.96%
6M
-38.04%
1Y
-51.61%
3Y*
-5.63%
5Y*
-2.30%
10Y*
20.67%

VOT

1D
1.65%
1M
8.71%
YTD
9.90%
6M
9.37%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
12.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOW vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
-37.96%-27.75%50.05%81.96%-40.18%17.93%94.97%58.56%36.55%75.40%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
9.90%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NOW and VOT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between NOW and VOT has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOW vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOW
NOW Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOW Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOW vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOWVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.14

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

0.84

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

2.49

-3.98

NOW vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOW Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOW and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOW vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOW drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than VOT's maximum drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOW and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOWVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.54%

-60.16%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.28%

-15.96%

-44.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.54%

-21.77%

-42.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.54%

-37.19%

-27.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.54%

-37.19%

-27.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.40%

0.00%

-59.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-9.95%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.66%

5.35%

+29.31%

Volatility

NOW vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) has a higher volatility of 24.39% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 6.83%. This indicates that NOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOWVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.39%

6.83%

+17.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.83%

13.60%

+32.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.47%

16.80%

+33.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.51%

21.51%

+22.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.90%

21.06%

+19.84%

Dividends

NOW vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

NOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.60%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOW and VOT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOW has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to VOT (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOW dropped -64.54% vs VOT's -60.16%.

VOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOW and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer