NOCBX vs. NMFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX).
NOCBX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2001. NMFIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2012.
Performance
NOCBX vs. NMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NOCBX vs. NMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | -0.09% | 6.17% | 1.10% | 5.07% | -14.51% | -1.62% | 7.32% | 9.76% | -1.03% | 4.05% |
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 7.82% | 23.11% | 1.74% | 6.62% | -7.21% | 13.68% | -2.59% | 24.34% | -10.26% | 22.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOCBX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than NMFIX's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX has underperformed NMFIX with an annualized return of 1.31%, while NMFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.63% annualized return.
NOCBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
NMFIX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 23.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NOCBX vs. NMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than NMFIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NOCBX vs. NMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
NOCBX
NMFIX
NOCBX vs. NMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOCBX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.66 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 2.35 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.38 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 3.16 | -1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.39 | 12.53 | -7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOCBX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.66 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.59 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.50 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.52 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between NOCBX and NMFIX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NOCBX vs. NMFIX - Dividend Comparison
NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than NMFIX's 5.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | 4.32% | 3.14% | 3.82% | 2.99% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 3.58% | 2.75% | 3.16% | 2.88% | 2.05% | 3.09% |
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 5.63% | 6.03% | 3.82% | 2.78% | 3.98% | 10.13% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 10.33% | 7.71% | 2.53% | 2.01% |
Drawdowns
NOCBX vs. NMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum NMFIX drawdown of -34.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and NMFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOCBX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.02% | -34.93% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -7.81% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.95% | -22.76% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.02% | -34.93% | +14.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.24% | -4.84% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -5.34% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.97% | -1.04% |
Volatility
NOCBX vs. NMFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) is 1.38%, while Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that NOCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NOCBX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 4.02% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 10.46% | -7.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44% | 14.55% | -10.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 13.73% | -7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 15.44% | -10.38% |