NMFIX vs. PAXDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NMFIX (Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund) and PAXDX (Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NMFIX returned 7.26%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for PAXDX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NMFIX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for PAXDX.

Performance

NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than PAXDX's 5.11% return.

NMFIX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: 8.86%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 7.76%

PAXDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.01%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 4.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	8.86%	23.11%	1.74%	6.62%	-7.21%	13.68%	-2.59%	24.34%	-10.26%	22.17%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	5.11%	18.37%	-1.55%	9.33%	-13.45%	14.24%	14.25%	25.88%	-4.25%	19.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NMFIX and PAXDX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016	0.74

The correlation between NMFIX and PAXDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NMFIX vs. PAXDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMFIX

NMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 34
NMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
NMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
NMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

PAXDX

PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 18
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMFIX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.96	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.34	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.21	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.69	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.74	5.03	+2.71

NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the PAXDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFIX and PAXDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, roughly equal to the maximum PAXDX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and PAXDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMFIX	PAXDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.93%	-33.58%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.20%	-4.49%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-14.56%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.76%	-25.04%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.93%	-0.74%	-3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-5.25%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	1.47%	+0.78%

Volatility

NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) at 0.00%. This indicates that NMFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMFIX	PAXDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	0.00%	+2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.40%	4.06%	+7.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	7.94%	+5.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.84%	13.16%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.44%	16.48%	-1.04%

NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXDX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Dividend Comparison

NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than PAXDX's 1.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	5.58%	6.03%	3.82%	2.78%	3.98%	10.13%	2.11%	2.47%	10.33%	7.71%	2.53%	2.01%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	1.06%	2.17%	2.07%	2.43%	2.48%	58.94%	2.88%	4.69%	3.55%	2.13%	0.12%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMFIX and PAXDX in my portfolio?

NMFIX and PAXDX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMFIX or PAXDX?

NMFIX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMFIX dropped -34.93% vs PAXDX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.