NMFIX vs. PAXDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX).
NMFIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2012. PAXDX is managed by Pax World. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016.
Performance
NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 6.79% | 23.11% | 1.74% | 6.62% | -7.21% | 13.68% | -2.59% | 24.34% | -10.26% | 22.17% |
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund | 5.11% | 18.37% | -1.55% | 9.33% | -13.45% | 14.24% | 14.25% | 25.88% | -4.25% | 19.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than PAXDX's 5.11% return.
NMFIX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
PAXDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 15.85%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXDX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMFIX vs. PAXDX — Risk / Return Rank
NMFIX
PAXDX
NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMFIX | PAXDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.42 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 1.98 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.95 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 9.47 | +2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMFIX | PAXDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.42 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.32 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMFIX and PAXDX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Dividend Comparison
NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than PAXDX's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 5.68% | 6.03% | 3.82% | 2.78% | 3.98% | 10.13% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 10.33% | 7.71% | 2.53% | 2.01% |
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund | 2.06% | 2.17% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 58.94% | 2.88% | 4.69% | 3.55% | 2.13% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, roughly equal to the maximum PAXDX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and PAXDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMFIX | PAXDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -33.58% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -8.05% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.76% | -25.04% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -0.74% | -5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -5.34% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.66% | +0.28% |
Volatility
NMFIX vs. PAXDX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) at 0.00%. This indicates that NMFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMFIX | PAXDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 0.00% | +3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 5.36% | +5.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 11.81% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 13.30% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 16.65% | -1.22% |