NMFIX vs. BGLYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX).
NMFIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2012. BGLYX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011.
Performance
NMFIX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMFIX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 6.79% | 23.11% | 1.74% | 6.62% | -7.21% | 13.68% | -2.59% | 24.34% | -10.26% | 22.17% |
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 8.53% | 13.04% | 9.01% | 3.32% | -5.47% | 16.13% | -3.25% | 25.44% | -8.06% | 10.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than BGLYX's 8.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMFIX having a 7.52% annualized return and BGLYX not far behind at 7.28%.
NMFIX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
BGLYX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMFIX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMFIX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank
NMFIX
BGLYX
NMFIX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMFIX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.52 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 2.04 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.45 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 9.89 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMFIX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.52 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.61 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.48 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMFIX and BGLYX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMFIX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison
NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than BGLYX's 28.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 5.68% | 6.03% | 3.82% | 2.78% | 3.98% | 10.13% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 10.33% | 7.71% | 2.53% | 2.01% |
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 28.55% | 30.30% | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.34% | 4.53% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 4.09% | 4.03% |
Drawdowns
NMFIX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, roughly equal to the maximum BGLYX drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and BGLYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMFIX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -36.54% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -7.55% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.76% | -20.94% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.93% | -36.54% | +1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -4.56% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -7.92% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.87% | +0.07% |
Volatility
NMFIX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) have volatilities of 3.83% and 3.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMFIX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 3.90% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 7.35% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 12.09% | +2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 13.46% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 15.62% | -0.19% |