PortfoliosLab logo
NOCBX vs. VFIDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NOCBX and VFIDX is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

NOCBX vs. VFIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NOCBX:

0.95

VFIDX:

1.31

Sortino Ratio

NOCBX:

1.64

VFIDX:

2.28

Omega Ratio

NOCBX:

1.19

VFIDX:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

NOCBX:

0.52

VFIDX:

0.91

Martin Ratio

NOCBX:

2.84

VFIDX:

4.61

Ulcer Index

NOCBX:

2.09%

VFIDX:

1.84%

Daily Std Dev

NOCBX:

5.42%

VFIDX:

5.51%

Max Drawdown

NOCBX:

-18.98%

VFIDX:

-20.12%

Current Drawdown

NOCBX:

-6.62%

VFIDX:

-2.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOCBX achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than VFIDX's 3.15% return. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX has underperformed VFIDX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while VFIDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.78% annualized return.


NOCBX

YTD

2.19%

1M

-0.11%

6M

0.41%

1Y

5.10%

3Y*

1.61%

5Y*

-0.71%

10Y*

1.55%

VFIDX

YTD

3.15%

1M

0.66%

6M

1.56%

1Y

7.15%

3Y*

3.80%

5Y*

0.68%

10Y*

2.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NOCBX vs. VFIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VFIDX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOCBX vs. VFIDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOCBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOCBX is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VFIDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VFIDX is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VFIDX is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VFIDX is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VFIDX is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VFIDX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VFIDX is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NOCBX vs. VFIDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NOCBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the VFIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCBX and VFIDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NOCBX vs. VFIDX - Dividend Comparison

NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than VFIDX's 4.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NOCBX
Northern Core Bond Fund
4.21%4.12%3.64%2.87%1.72%3.66%2.67%3.06%2.90%2.86%3.38%2.73%
VFIDX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares
4.81%4.65%3.89%3.21%4.01%5.79%3.12%3.32%3.08%3.93%3.66%4.14%

Drawdowns

NOCBX vs. VFIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, smaller than the maximum VFIDX drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and VFIDX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NOCBX vs. VFIDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) is 1.45%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFIDX) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that NOCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...