PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NOCBX vs. USIBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


NOCBXUSIBX
YTD Return1.56%2.65%
1Y Return6.95%7.87%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.39%-2.13%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.59%-0.15%
10Y Return (Ann)1.01%1.79%
Sharpe Ratio1.371.63
Sortino Ratio1.982.41
Omega Ratio1.241.29
Calmar Ratio0.510.58
Martin Ratio4.976.22
Ulcer Index1.65%1.44%
Daily Std Dev5.99%5.49%
Max Drawdown-20.21%-20.24%
Current Drawdown-9.86%-8.34%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between NOCBX and USIBX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

NOCBX vs. USIBX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NOCBX achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than USIBX's 2.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX has underperformed USIBX with an annualized return of 1.01%, while USIBX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.42%
2.57%
NOCBX
USIBX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NOCBX vs. USIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than USIBX's 0.63% expense ratio.


USIBX
USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for USIBX: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%
Expense ratio chart for NOCBX: current value at 0.42% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.42%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOCBX vs. USIBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOCBX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NOCBX, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NOCBX, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NOCBX, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NOCBX, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NOCBX, currently valued at 4.97, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.97
USIBX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for USIBX, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for USIBX, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for USIBX, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for USIBX, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for USIBX, currently valued at 6.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.22

NOCBX vs. USIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOCBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the USIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCBX and USIBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.37
1.63
NOCBX
USIBX

Dividends

NOCBX vs. USIBX - Dividend Comparison

NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than USIBX's 4.46% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NOCBX
Northern Core Bond Fund
4.09%3.64%2.87%1.72%1.97%2.67%3.06%2.90%2.19%2.40%2.17%2.63%
USIBX
USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund
4.46%4.09%3.19%2.32%3.01%3.58%3.68%3.45%3.86%4.23%4.11%4.38%

Drawdowns

NOCBX vs. USIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, roughly equal to the maximum USIBX drawdown of -20.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and USIBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.86%
-8.34%
NOCBX
USIBX

Volatility

NOCBX vs. USIBX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) have volatilities of 1.72% and 1.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.72%
1.67%
NOCBX
USIBX