NOCBX vs. USIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX).
NOCBX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2001. USIBX is managed by Victory Capital. It was launched on Aug 2, 1999.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NOCBX or USIBX.
Key characteristics
| NOCBX | USIBX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.30% | -0.38% |
| 1Y Return | 2.15% | 3.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.87% | -1.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.14% | 1.69% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.26% | 2.41% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.25 | 0.53 |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.79% | 6.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.02% | -17.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.08% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOCBX and USIBX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NOCBX vs. USIBX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NOCBX achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly lower than USIBX's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX has underperformed USIBX with an annualized return of 1.26%, while USIBX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.41% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NOCBX vs. USIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than USIBX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NOCBX vs. USIBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NOCBX vs. USIBX - Dividend Comparison
NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than USIBX's 4.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | 3.92% | 3.65% | 2.86% | 1.68% | 3.65% | 2.67% | 3.06% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 3.24% | 2.59% | 2.77% |
USIBX USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund | 4.34% | 4.09% | 3.19% | 4.98% | 6.60% | 4.93% | 3.68% | 3.45% | 3.86% | 4.35% | 4.25% | 4.42% |
Drawdowns
NOCBX vs. USIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -19.02%, which is greater than USIBX's maximum drawdown of -17.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and USIBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NOCBX vs. USIBX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) at 1.23%. This indicates that NOCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.