NOCBX vs. FGBPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX).
NOCBX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2001. FGBPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 27, 2002.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NOCBX or FGBPX.
Performance
NOCBX vs. FGBPX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOCBX achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than FGBPX's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX has underperformed FGBPX with an annualized return of 0.96%, while FGBPX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.57% annualized return.
NOCBX
1.45%
-0.56%
2.78%
6.01%
-0.70%
0.96%
FGBPX
2.03%
-0.51%
3.25%
6.62%
-0.15%
1.57%
Key characteristics
| NOCBX | FGBPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.03 | 0.97 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.49 | 1.44 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.17 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.39 | 0.38 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.43 | 3.18 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.75% | 1.75% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.81% | 5.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.21% | -20.21% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.97% | -9.77% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NOCBX vs. FGBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FGBPX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between NOCBX and FGBPX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NOCBX vs. FGBPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NOCBX vs. FGBPX - Dividend Comparison
NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than FGBPX's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | 3.79% | 3.64% | 2.87% | 1.72% | 1.97% | 2.67% | 3.06% | 2.90% | 2.19% | 2.40% | 2.17% | 2.63% |
FGBPX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I | 3.86% | 3.48% | 2.59% | 1.52% | 1.80% | 2.72% | 2.82% | 2.12% | 2.45% | 2.86% | 2.48% | 2.31% |
Drawdowns
NOCBX vs. FGBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FGBPX drawdown of -20.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and FGBPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NOCBX vs. FGBPX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class I (FGBPX) have volatilities of 1.47% and 1.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.