PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
NOCBX vs. EAGG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

NOCBX vs. EAGG

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG).

NOCBX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2001. EAGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2018.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NOCBX or EAGG.

Correlation

The correlation between NOCBX and EAGG is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

NOCBX vs. EAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

NOCBX:

3.70%

EAGG:

5.87%

Max Drawdown

NOCBX:

-0.34%

EAGG:

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

NOCBX:

-0.34%

EAGG:

-0.45%

Returns By Period

NOCBX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EAGG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NOCBX vs. EAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than EAGG's 0.10% expense ratio.

NOCBX
Northern Core Bond Fund
EAGG
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOCBX vs. EAGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NOCBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOCBX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
EAGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAGG is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAGG is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAGG is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAGG is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAGG is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAGG is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NOCBX vs. EAGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

NOCBX vs. EAGG - Dividend Comparison

NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than EAGG's 3.93% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NOCBX
Northern Core Bond Fund		4.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAGG
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF		3.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NOCBX vs. EAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -0.34%, smaller than the maximum EAGG drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and EAGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

NOCBX vs. EAGG - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...