PortfoliosLab logo
NOCBX vs. LUBIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NOCBX and LUBIX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

NOCBX vs. LUBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NOCBX:

0.95

LUBIX:

1.09

Sortino Ratio

NOCBX:

1.64

LUBIX:

1.91

Omega Ratio

NOCBX:

1.19

LUBIX:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

NOCBX:

0.52

LUBIX:

0.62

Martin Ratio

NOCBX:

2.84

LUBIX:

4.02

Ulcer Index

NOCBX:

2.09%

LUBIX:

1.74%

Daily Std Dev

NOCBX:

5.42%

LUBIX:

5.40%

Max Drawdown

NOCBX:

-18.98%

LUBIX:

-22.11%

Current Drawdown

NOCBX:

-6.62%

LUBIX:

-5.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOCBX achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly higher than LUBIX's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NOCBX has underperformed LUBIX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while LUBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.68% annualized return.


NOCBX

YTD

2.19%

1M

-0.11%

6M

0.41%

1Y

5.10%

3Y*

1.61%

5Y*

-0.71%

10Y*

1.55%

LUBIX

YTD

2.03%

1M

0.48%

6M

0.30%

1Y

5.82%

3Y*

3.03%

5Y*

0.41%

10Y*

2.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Northern Core Bond Fund

Thrivent Income Fund

NOCBX vs. LUBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than LUBIX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOCBX vs. LUBIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOCBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOCBX is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOCBX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LUBIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LUBIX is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LUBIX is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LUBIX is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LUBIX is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LUBIX is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LUBIX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NOCBX vs. LUBIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NOCBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the LUBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCBX and LUBIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NOCBX vs. LUBIX - Dividend Comparison

NOCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, which matches LUBIX's 4.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NOCBX
Northern Core Bond Fund
4.21%4.12%3.64%2.87%1.72%3.66%2.67%3.06%2.90%2.86%3.38%2.73%
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
4.20%4.12%3.68%3.30%4.18%5.21%3.42%3.44%3.34%3.32%3.91%3.90%

Drawdowns

NOCBX vs. LUBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCBX drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, smaller than the maximum LUBIX drawdown of -22.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCBX and LUBIX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NOCBX vs. LUBIX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) have volatilities of 1.45% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...