PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. XLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. XLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 13.90% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has underperformed XLI with an annualized return of 9.94%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.


NOBL

1D
0.54%
1M
4.72%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.43%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
9.94%

XLI

1D
0.59%
1M
0.96%
YTD
13.90%
6M
13.10%
1Y
25.17%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
7.43%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
13.90%19.35%17.31%18.13%-5.57%21.08%10.91%29.08%-13.25%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and XLI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.85

The correlation between NOBL and XLI shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NOBL vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOBL
XLI

Consumer Defensive

23.6%

-

Industrials

20.2%
90.9%

Financial Services

12.8%

-

Healthcare

10.2%

-

Basic Materials

10.2%

-

Utilities

5.7%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
0.5%

Technology

4.6%
3.8%

Real Estate

4.6%

-

Energy

2.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

NOBL
23.6%
XLI

-

Industrials

NOBL
20.2%
XLI
90.9%

Financial Services

NOBL
12.8%
XLI

-

Healthcare

NOBL
10.2%
XLI

-

Basic Materials

NOBL
10.2%
XLI

-

Utilities

NOBL
5.7%
XLI
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NOBL
5.3%
XLI
0.5%

Technology

NOBL
4.6%
XLI
3.8%

Real Estate

NOBL
4.6%
XLI

-

Energy

NOBL
2.9%
XLI

-

Communication Services

NOBL

-

XLI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XLI
XLI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBLXLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.98

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

7.82

-4.28

NOBL vs. XLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the XLI Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and XLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and XLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLXLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-62.26%

+26.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-12.21%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-18.49%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-21.64%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-42.33%

+6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-1.24%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-9.20%

+5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.09%

+0.47%

Volatility

NOBL vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.95%, while Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLXLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

6.22%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

13.59%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

16.17%

-4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

17.55%

-3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

20.04%

-3.43%

NOBL vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than XLI's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.04%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.16%1.29%1.44%1.63%1.63%1.25%1.55%1.94%2.15%1.77%2.07%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and XLI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs XLI's -62.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 9.94% for NOBL. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while XLI is Industrials Equities. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.08% for XLI.

XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and XLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer