NOBL vs. PMMY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and PMMY (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while PMMY is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. NOBL is passively managed, while PMMY is actively managed. Over the past year, NOBL returned 10.44% vs 6.01% for PMMY. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMMY.

Performance

NOBL vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than PMMY's 2.25% return.

NOBL

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 10.44%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 9.58%

PMMY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 2.25%
• 6M: 2.76%
• 1Y: 6.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	4.61%	8.64%
PMMY PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May	2.25%	4.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and PMMY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

NOBL vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 25
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PMMY

PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 98
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOBL	PMMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	5.38	-4.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	9.05	-7.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	2.46	-1.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	17.01	-15.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.98	90.26	-87.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOBL vs. PMMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the PMMY Sharpe Ratio of 5.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and PMMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOBL	PMMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	5.38	-4.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	4.59	-3.94

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and PMMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOBL	PMMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-0.36%	-35.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-0.36%	-8.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.99%	0.00%	-4.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-0.04%	-3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	0.07%	+3.44%

Volatility

NOBL vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) at 0.34%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOBL	PMMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	0.34%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	0.87%	+7.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.37%	1.12%	+10.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.39%	1.39%	+13.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.60%	1.39%	+15.21%

NOBL vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOBL vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while PMMY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.10%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
PMMY PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOBL and PMMY in my portfolio?

NOBL and PMMY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOBL or PMMY?

NOBL has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to PMMY (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs PMMY's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, NOBL or PMMY?

On 1-year performance, NOBL leads with 10.44% vs 6.01% for PMMY. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PMMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOBL or PMMY?

Over the 1-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOBL or PMMY?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOBL or PMMY?

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for PMMY.

What is the main difference between NOBL and PMMY?

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while PMMY is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.50% for PMMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.38 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.