PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. KNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. KNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than KNGLX's 2.66% return.


NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%

KNGLX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.09%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.73%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. KNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.33%
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
2.66%6.43%2.91%6.46%-7.29%23.23%7.08%26.58%-4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and KNGLX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2018

0.97

The correlation between NOBL and KNGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. KNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

KNGLX
KNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
KNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. KNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOBLKNGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.89

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

2.40

+0.18

NOBL vs. KNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the KNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and KNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOBLKNGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.74

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.25

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.41

+0.23

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. KNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than KNGLX's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and KNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLKNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-31.48%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-8.90%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-14.79%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-18.25%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.99%

-5.58%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-4.62%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.27%

+0.23%

Volatility

NOBL vs. KNGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 2.36%, while CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLKNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.78%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

7.71%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

10.62%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.02%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

17.15%

-0.55%

NOBL vs. KNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KNGLX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. KNGLX - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than KNGLX's 12.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNGLX
CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund
12.76%8.02%9.60%7.99%4.54%4.41%3.53%4.53%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, NOBL and KNGLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KNGLX has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs KNGLX's -31.48%.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and KNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer