NOBL vs. KNGLX
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and KNGLX (CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund) are both funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while KNGLX is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NOBL returned 6.18%/yr vs 4.41%/yr for KNGLX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for KNGLX.
Performance
NOBL vs. KNGLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than KNGLX's 4.69% return.
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
KNGLX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL vs. KNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 6.48% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% |
KNGLX CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund | 4.69% | 6.43% | 2.91% | 6.46% | -7.29% | 23.23% | 7.08% | 26.58% | -4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and KNGLX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between NOBL and KNGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. KNGLX — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
KNGLX
NOBL vs. KNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOBL | KNGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 3.40 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. KNGLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than KNGLX's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and KNGLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | KNGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -31.48% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -8.90% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -14.79% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | -18.25% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -3.70% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -4.62% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 3.37% | +0.21% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. KNGLX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund (KNGLX) at 3.15%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | KNGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 3.15% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 7.89% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 10.86% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 14.01% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 17.12% | -0.52% |
NOBL vs. KNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KNGLX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOBL vs. KNGLX - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than KNGLX's 12.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGLX CBOE Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Fund | 12.51% | 8.02% | 9.60% | 7.99% | 4.54% | 4.41% | 3.53% | 4.53% | 4.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.06% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, NOBL and KNGLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NOBL has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to KNGLX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs KNGLX's -31.48%.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBL and KNGLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer