NOBL vs. DEW
NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and DEW (WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DEW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NOBL returned 9.97%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for DEW. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DEW.
Performance
NOBL vs. DEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than DEW's 12.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NOBL having a 9.97% annualized return and DEW not far behind at 9.72%.
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
DEW
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 25.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
NOBL vs. DEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 6.48% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 12.97% | 22.39% | 11.58% | 9.39% | -2.73% | 21.29% | -7.32% | 20.45% | -10.58% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and DEW is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between NOBL and DEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
NOBL vs. DEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NOBL
DEW
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
NOBL
DEW
Industrials
NOBL
DEW
Financial Services
NOBL
DEW
Healthcare
NOBL
DEW
Basic Materials
NOBL
DEW
Utilities
NOBL
DEW
Consumer Cyclical
NOBL
DEW
Technology
NOBL
DEW
Real Estate
NOBL
DEW
Energy
NOBL
DEW
Communication Services
NOBL
-
DEW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. DEW — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
DEW
NOBL vs. DEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOBL | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.47 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 4.06 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 15.88 | -12.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. DEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum DEW drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and DEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -65.55% | +30.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -6.34% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -11.80% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | -18.86% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | -38.77% | +3.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -1.12% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -12.41% | +8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 1.62% | +1.96% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. DEW - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) at 2.77%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 2.77% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 7.35% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 9.76% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 12.98% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 15.42% | +1.18% |
NOBL vs. DEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DEW's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOBL vs. DEW - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than DEW's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 3.18% | 3.71% | 4.02% | 4.55% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.10% | 3.74% | 4.17% | 3.18% | 3.42% | 4.32% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.06% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOBL and DEW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOBL has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to DEW (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs DEW's -65.55%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.97% vs 9.72% for DEW. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 9.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.
DEW has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.06% for NOBL.
NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while DEW is Large Cap Value Equities. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DEW tracks WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.58% for DEW.
DEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOBL and DEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer