PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBL vs. ALTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBL vs. ALTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than ALTY's 6.19% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBL has outperformed ALTY with an annualized return of 9.51%, while ALTY has yielded a comparatively lower 6.16% annualized return.


NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%

ALTY

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.31%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.51%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. ALTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
6.19%11.07%10.88%10.58%-11.92%23.08%-12.82%21.44%-6.18%10.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and ALTY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.58

The correlation between NOBL and ALTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOBL vs. ALTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOBL
ALTY

Consumer Defensive

23.5%
2.6%

Industrials

20.3%
1.0%

Financial Services

12.4%
0.1%

Basic Materials

10.9%
0.4%

Healthcare

9.7%
1.4%

Utilities

6.4%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
4.1%

Real Estate

4.6%
33.2%

Technology

3.6%
18.3%

Energy

3.4%
21.0%

Communication Services

-

5.3%

Consumer Defensive

NOBL
23.5%
ALTY
2.6%

Industrials

NOBL
20.3%
ALTY
1.0%

Financial Services

NOBL
12.4%
ALTY
0.1%

Basic Materials

NOBL
10.9%
ALTY
0.4%

Healthcare

NOBL
9.7%
ALTY
1.4%

Utilities

NOBL
6.4%
ALTY
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

NOBL
5.1%
ALTY
4.1%

Real Estate

NOBL
4.6%
ALTY
33.2%

Technology

NOBL
3.6%
ALTY
18.3%

Energy

NOBL
3.4%
ALTY
21.0%

Communication Services

NOBL

-

ALTY
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBL vs. ALTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTY
ALTY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. ALTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOBLALTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.54

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

3.64

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

16.84

-14.26

NOBL vs. ALTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the ALTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and ALTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOBLALTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

2.73

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.37

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.33

+0.31

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. ALTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum ALTY drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and ALTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBLALTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-51.47%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-4.34%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-10.08%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-18.48%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-51.47%

+16.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.99%

-0.37%

-5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-6.75%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

0.94%

+2.56%

Volatility

NOBL vs. ALTY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) at 1.41%. This indicates that NOBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBLALTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

1.41%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

4.38%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

5.79%

+5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

10.61%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

16.58%

+0.02%

NOBL vs. ALTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBL vs. ALTY - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than ALTY's 8.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
8.08%7.50%7.88%7.31%7.66%6.88%9.20%8.74%8.49%7.52%8.20%4.21%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBL and ALTY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOBL has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to ALTY (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs ALTY's -51.47%.

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.51% vs 6.16% for ALTY. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ALTY has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ALTY.

ALTY has the higher dividend yield at 8.08%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.

NOBL is categorized as Dividend, while ALTY is Global Allocation. NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while ALTY tracks Indxx SuperDividend Alternatives Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.50% for ALTY.

ALTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBL and ALTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer